mercredi 30 septembre 2026
RechercherExplore
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
Source document· December 10, 2025

Fed meeting live coverage: Federal Reserve cuts interest rates by 0.25%, Powell says there's 'no risk-free path'

View original at finance.yahoo.com
Fed meeting live coverage: Federal Reserve cuts interest rates by 0.25%, Powell says there's 'no risk-free path' The Federal Reserve cut interest rates by 25 basis points at the conclusion of its two-day meeting on Wednesday, marking the central bank's third cut of the year…
Opening lines of the source · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

Ce que nous avons tiré de cette source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • The 0.25% rate cut is a rather small number that could have been doubled, at least doubled, and rates should be much lower

    80% confidence
  • US economy will improve in 2026 due to consumer spending holding up, AI spending on data centers, and supportive fiscal policy

    80% confidence
  • The FOMC still expects one more interest rate cut next year, but the range of projections is unusually wide. The Fed is unlikely to cut again until after a new Chair replaces Jerome Powell in May

    80% confidence
  • Some people feel we should stop here and wait, some feel like we should cut once or more this year and next year

    80% confidence
  • A rate hike is not anybody's base case at this point

    80% confidence
  • Low housing supply and favorable mortgage rates during the pandemic era are keeping people in their homes and creating significant challenges

    80% confidence
  • The federal funds rate is 3 percentage points too high

    80% confidence
  • The Fed's obligation is to make sure that a one-time increase in the price level does not become an ongoing inflation problem

    80% confidence
  • A reasonable base case is that the effects of tariffs on inflation will be relatively short-lived, effectively a one-time shift in the price level

    80% confidence
  • Previous cycles of tech innovation have generally seen some jobs destroyed and others created, and when you get through it, you have higher productivity and enough jobs for people

    80% confidence
  • The statement signaled a pause from here, noting that the FOMC will now consider the extent and timing of additional adjustments to the target range

    80% confidence
  • Housing is going to be a problem. We can raise and lower interest rates, but we don't really have the tools to address a structural housing shortage

    80% confidence
  • Powell came across calm rather than edgy in tone, suggesting he is comfortable and in charge rather than on the ropes as in October

    80% confidence
  • AI impact on jobs is probably part of the story but not a big part yet, and we don't know whether it will be

    80% confidence
  • Powell doesn't expect a rate hike in January

    80% confidence
  • A 25 basis point decline in the federal funds rate won't make much of a difference for people in the housing market

    80% confidence
  • Trump will use a willingness to cut rates as a litmus test for his pick for next Fed chair

    80% confidence
  • There is no risk-free path for policy as the Fed navigates tension between employment and inflation goals

    80% confidence
  • The Fed will need to be careful in assessing household survey data due to distortions from the government shutdown

    80% confidence
  • The baseline would be solid growth next year

    80% confidence
  • Unemployment insurance claims are not rising while job finding rates are low, which is a little bit curious

    80% confidence
  • The Fed is killing growth because they're so afraid of inflation

    80% confidence
  • Fed Chair Powell is a 'stiff' and 'dead head'

    80% confidence
  • Companies are making big announcements of layoffs and saying they're not going to hire anybody for a long time, citing AI

    80% confidence
  • The labor outlook remained dismal according to consumer sentiment survey

    80% confidence
  • It's really tariffs that are causing most of the inflation overshoot

    80% confidence
  • The take on productivity and growth is very risk-friendly, and the Fed chair suggests productivity may be running about 2%, allowing the economy to grow faster without generating excess inflation

    80% confidence
  • The central bank expects the tariffs to represent a one-time increase in prices, and their job is to make sure that it is

    80% confidence
  • Powell sounded very upbeat on productivity and growth, including AI effects

    80% confidence

Data points we hold from this source

Federal Reserve · unemployment rate forecast4.4 percent
Federal Reserve · core pce inflation forecast2.5 percent
Federal Reserve · gdp growth forecast1.7 percent
Federal Reserve · 30 year mortgage rate6.0 percent
Federal Reserve · productivity growth2 percent

Cité dans ces articles de Via News

Ce que nous savons · l'intelligence derrière cette page
En direct du substrat
Ce que nous observons
The Agentic Takeover of the CFO's Office
Enterprise finance software vendors—BlackLine, OneStream, Numero AI, and Oracle—are racing to embed autonomous AI agents into core financial operations (close, consolidation, reporting), backed by consolidation M&A (Numero-Royu, BlackLine-WiseLayer), fresh leadership hires, and survey data showing nearly a quarter of CFOs plan to boost AI spending over 50%. Adoption momentum is strong even as at least one bellwether (Oracle) sees its stock lag year-to-date, suggesting the market hasn't yet fully priced in the shift from AI-as-feature to AI-as-agent in finance.
Notre lecture des données ›
Signaux que nous suivons
Satellite-Terrestrial Network Integration Acceleration
Increased investment and launches in hybrid satellite-cellular networks across telecom industry; competitive responses from other carriers; regulatory activity around satellite spectrum; expansion of emergency/rural connectivity use cases
Tendances que nous surveillons ›
Là où les sources divergent
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
Two significantly different EPS values (10.21 vs 2.68 USD_per_share) are reported for Morgan Stanley on the same observation date (2025-12-31). Fact A specifies FY 2025, while Fact B's 'N/A' fiscal period is ambiguous. If both represent FY 2025 annual EPS, these values directly conflict. The magnitude of the difference (3.8x) is too large to attribute to rounding or minor calculation variations. The missing fiscal period in Fact B raises data quality concerns, but same-date observation + same attribute should reference the same period.
Nous signalons les conflits ouvertement ›
Vérifié récemment
✓ Vérifié avec la source d'origine
4,984
faits reliés à leur source — et nous signalons ceux qui ne tiennent pas.
101 entités suivies4,984 faits vérifiés avec la source5,315 documents sources archivés
Interrogez ces données → isubstrate.com